December Pph 21 Reporting Under The Coretax Administration System: A Case Study At An Accounting Services Firm

Authors

  • Junawan `Junawan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Author
  • Noviani Noviani Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Author
  • Nazwa Aidiva Adha Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Author

Keywords:

Article 21 Income Tax, CoreTax Administration System, Digital Tax Administration

Abstract

Every December, employers face one of the most demanding stretches in the tax calendar, year-end payroll adjustments pile up, income components grow more varied, and the window for filing a clean tax return shrinks. This study takes a close look at how an accounting services firm in Medan navigated that pressure while working inside the CoreTax Administration System (CTAS), Indonesia's newly integrated tax platform. Using a qualitative case-study design, we gathered data through in-depth interviews with tax and finance staff, direct observation of the filing workflow, and a review of payroll and withholding documents from January through December 2025. What we found was a process that was largely compliant from start to finish, from collecting payroll data all the way to submitting the monthly tax return, but not without friction. Identity-matching issues between employees' national ID numbers and tax IDs, payroll data that was not always synchronized, and login errors near filing deadlines were among the recurring pain points. CTAS did make the process more structured and traceable compared to earlier manual methods, yet its real-world effectiveness still hinged on the quality of input data and how well different teams, HR, payroll, finance, and tax, were working together. Based on these findings, we argue that improving standard operating procedures, building a pre-submission data checklist, tightening cross-team coordination, and investing in user training are the most practical steps the firm can take to strengthen compliance going forward.

References

Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–338.

Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818–860.

Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and the acceptance of online services. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

Directorate General of Taxes. (2016). Regulation No. PER-16/PJ/2016 on Technical Guidelines for Withholding, Remittance, and Reporting of Article 21/26 Income Tax.

Directorate General of Taxes. (2020). Strategic Plan of the Directorate General of Taxes 2020–2024.

Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. A. (2018). Fundamentals of Business Process Management (2nd ed.). Springer.

Hung, S.-Y., Chang, C.-M., & Yu, T.-J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 97–122.

Kirchler, E. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge University Press.

Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Regulation No. 112/PMK.03/2022 on Tax Identification Numbers for Individual, Corporate, and Government Taxpayers.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

OECD. (2020). Tax Administration 2020: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2021). Tax Administration 3.0: The Digital Transformation of Tax Administration. OECD Publishing.

Republic of Indonesia. (1983a). Law No. 6 of 1983 on General Tax Provisions and Procedures (as last amended by Law No. 7 of 2021).

Republic of Indonesia. (1983b). Law No. 7 of 1983 on Income Tax (as last amended by Law No. 7 of 2021).

Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Law No. 7 of 2021 on Tax Regulation Harmonization.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

December Pph 21 Reporting Under The Coretax Administration System: A Case Study At An Accounting Services Firm. (2026). Prosiding Simposium Ilmiah Akuntansi, 434-438. https://sia-iaikpd.fdaptsu.org/index.php/sia/article/view/353

Similar Articles

61-70 of 91

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>